Showing posts with label Isavasyopanishad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Isavasyopanishad. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

(Oct 23,2013) Spiritual Message for the Day – Isavasyopanishad by Swami Krishnananda

Isavasyopanishad
Divine Life Society Publication: Essays on the Upanishads by Swami Krishnananda

Knowledge pertains to the essential nature of the Self. Knowledge neither creates nor modifies nor obtains nor purifies the Self, because the relationship between knowledge and the Self is not one of doer and doing. The mantras of the Isavasyopanishad assert that the true Self is secondless, non-doer, non-enjoyer, pure and ever untainted by sin. 

The universe in essence is the truth of God Himself. There is nothing in this universe which can have any value or being without the existence of God. Divinity should be felt as the pratyagatman or the Inner Self of oneself. One should assert that the whole existence is, in its objective form, unreal and that oneself in fact is the essential Atman existing as the basis and the truth of everything.

Even as a scented stick begins to give out its fragrance when the external fungus growing over it is rubbed out, the light of the Self reveals itself when the external crust of the sense of doership and enjoyership which is falsely imagined is completely erased out. The multiplicity and the duality of the universe should be denied in the light of the fact that the Lord, the one Self, alone exists. This omnipresent Self cannot be associated with individual functions, like doership and enjoyership. Name, form and action which characterize the world cannot be the natures of God, because these are objective perceptions and not eternal values. The universe, thus, gets renounced, because God is the only Truth.

Tena tyaktena means “by such renunciation” consequent upon the knowledge of the only existence which is God. Renunciation is the result of the knowledge of Truth. Anything that is abandoned as unconnected with the Self does not become useful to the Self in any way. Everyone in the world is dependent on the not-Self. But when the not-Self is denied one cannot be dependent on it. The denial of the not-Self or the renunciation of the universe means that the Self is not helped by any external agency and it has to save itself through itself. It also means that previous to knowledge, i.e., when the Self appeared to be entangled in the not-self, it was in bondage, as it were, but now because of disentanglement it saves itself and protects itself and is dependent on itself. Because the Self is permanent its independence also is permanent.

Human knowledge is an action alone, because it is produced by the motion of the mind and the senses. The knowledge propounded in the Advaita Vedanta is objectless knowledge, and it is never produced but realised. It is not the knowledge of something but the knowledge of the knower himself. It is atma-sakshatkara that Shankara means by knowledge when he says that action is the antithesis of knowledge.

Freedom from action does not simply mean freedom from bodily movement, but freedom from objective thinking, feeling and willing. The knowledge of the Self is absolutely necessary in order to transcend the recurring pains of birth, life and death. Pleasure and pain, confusion and mistake, are all the results of ignorance and desire which are possible only in the case of an individual. The Absolute Being can have no such individual experiences. The cause of misery, together with all its effects, is completely rooted out in the state of the Absolute. The Atman transcends and includes every created being. All values, except existence, are the effects of the relations that the subject develops with the objects. Relations being private and unreal, all values, too, are unreal. Pure existence, which is independent of all individualistic values, alone is real.  A combination of karma and upasana is beneficial; it leads to krama-mukti; but when they are performed separately, they lead to their respective specified limited results, and make one take birth as an individual.

Realize that every function of the universe is carried on properly, merely through the very existence of the Absolute, even if it does not perform any act. The Atman is intense knowledge, without internal or external restrictions.

The Isavasyopanishad advises the combination of action with objective knowledge and not with Absolute knowledge. The Absolute is always opposed to objectiveness. Action and Absolute knowledge differ from one another in their causes, natures and results. Action is caused by the sense of imperfection. Its nature is distraction and its result is perishable. Knowledge is caused by perfection. Its nature is peace and its result is eternal. Hence action and knowledge are different from one another. It is not possible to say that action can be combined with knowledge in the beginning, though not in the end, because the moment there is the dawn of knowledge there is the cessation of action. It is not possible for fire to be hot and cold at the same time. Knowledge cannot co-exist with its opposite, viz., action that is characterized by motion. Knowledge is motionless. When the cause of action, viz., ignorance, is removed, all its effects also are removed.

Absolute knowledge gives rise to immediate realization or Sadyo-mukti. The combination of action is only with relative knowledge, for, in Absolute knowledge there is no motion, whatever. Absoluteness means existence merely, and not changing or moving.

 Excerpts from:
Isavasyopanishad - Essays on the Upanishads by Swami Krishnananda

If you would like to purchase the print edition, visit:
http://www.dlshq.org/cgi-bin/store/commerce.cgi?

If you would like to contribute to the dissemination of spiritual knowledge please contact the General Secretary at:

Tuesday, April 9, 2013

(Apr 8, 2013) Spiritual Message of the Day: Action is the antithesis of knowledge


Action is the antithesis of knowledge
From Divine Life Society Publication “Essays on the Upanishads - Isavasyopanishad” by Swami Krishnananda

The law of action - Wishing to live and ceasing from action do not go hand in hand.  If man wishes to live, he has to act. If he does not act, he cannot live. Freedom from action does not simply mean freedom from bodily movement, but freedom from objective thinking, feeling and willing. (Isavasyopanishad)

The knowledge of the human being is knowledge of some object or objects, other than the knower. The knowing faculty knows an object only as it wants to know it and as it is capable of knowing it, and not as the object is really in itself. It is a perishable process of struggle for perfection.

Human knowledge is an action alone, because it is produced by the motion of the mind and the senses. The knowledge propounded in the Advaita Vedanta is objectless knowledge, and it is never produced but realised. It is not the knowledge of something but the knowledge of the knower himself. It is atma-sakshatkara that Shankara means by knowledge when he says that action is the antithesis of knowledge.
Action, an effort towards the achievement of an end, has become an indispensable part of the individual self. It is the nature of his action that determines the nature of his life. Jijivisha or wish to live has as its effects the desire to possess and develop relations with external phenomena.

Generally an action is done only with the constricted vision without the correct knowledge of all its consequences. When a physician prescribes a medicine for the cure of a disease it is not enough if he just knows that a particular medicine has got the capacity to counteract that disease. He should also know what reactions the drug may bring about in the patient in spite of its allaying that one disease. The individual, when he wants to fulfill a desire, simply knows what action is able to fulfill that desire, without knowing that the same action may disturb several other aspects of life and bring to him as a reaction great grief later on, though it may temporarily enchant the desirer to believe that the desire is fulfilled. This is why the world is both pleasurable and miserable; it is the effect of desires as well as their unforeseen consequences.

An individual is born in a particular condition or environment because the individual either wished to live in such a condition or it is the consequence or reaction of certain actions which it performed either voluntarily or being compelled by the impressions of previous actions. The world is the name given to the manner in which the individuals experience in their own selves the reactions of their own desires and actions.

Action, ordinarily, therefore, is a movement of the self towards the not-self and extra-ordinarily a movement of the not-self towards the Self. But generally the latter process is not included in the category of what we understand by action. The latter is the natural absorption of the Spirit into itself, a genuine unfoldment, or rather the pristine illumination of itself to itself. It is therefore the process of the cessation of action, though all processes are actions in the strict sense.

By action we mean the expression of a desire, and movement towards Truth is not the effect of a desire, because it is a desire to destroy desire, an effort to stop effort. Such a desire is not a desire, and such an action is not an action. It is the flaming march of the soul towards its extension into infinity. When Shankara contends that action and knowledge are like darkness and light respectively, he refers to the action of the ego directed to the acquisition of objects and states circumscribed by space, time and causation. Such an action is evidently alien to the characteristics of the knowledge of Truth.

Man is a slave of the body because he loves it and because of this love he has to act. Man is never satisfied with simply existing and ever tries to become something else. Therefore, the wise aspirant should perform action knowing that it is not possible to cease from action as long as he is bound by human consciousness. And this should be done with the knowledge of the limitations of action, with the knowledge that action not properly guided by right discrimination may lead to self- imprisonment and sorrow.

This second mantra of the Isavasya Upanishad which refers to life in the mind and the body, lays down the law of action, that one should wish to live by performing action, because wishing to live and ceasing from action do not go hand in hand. If man wishes to live, he has to act. If he does not act, he cannot live. Freedom from action does not simply mean freedom from bodily movement, but freedom from objective thinking, feeling and willing.

Continue to read:
 “Essays on Upanishads – Isavasyopanishad” by Swami Krishnananda
“The Controversy over Action and Knowledge” by Swami Krishnananda
“Self-Knowledge” by Swami Sivananada